[aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity through shorterpackets
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgThu Oct 12 21:21:35 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity through shorterpackets
- Next message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> For my calculations I am going to pull a TXD of 100 > milliseconds out of > my hat. That's fairly reasonable. I usually assume around 120. > I believe is commonly used, a TXTail = 100 milliseconds. 20 Is that common? I know none of my trackers do that. Their tail is about 13 msec. > using Mic-E, mostly without extraneous comments, and the rest are > sending uncompressed data in the 40 character range. APRSworld says the average comment text length is 29.5 characters, if you're wondering. > numbers would be 150 msec (TXD+TXT) and 308 msec (data packet) for a > total of 458 msec. I think this is close to what I'm seeing in real life. I'm working on improving my timeslotting support to use the 1pps signal from the GPS receiver - I'm trying to get at least 2 slots per second for a commercial customer. > As things stand now, with 1200 baud on 144.39, reducing > TXD+TXT to the > bare minimum nearly cuts the typical on air time in half, perhaps > efforts should be expended in that direction first? Absolutely. Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity through shorterpackets
- Next message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
