[aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
Curt Mills archer at eskimo.comFri Oct 13 03:02:17 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Next message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Joel Maslak wrote: > Even the slowest radio can decode this. It's not a radio speed issue on the > RX end if you run squelch open, as is recommended for packet. Even sound card > packet should be able to handle open squelch, so home stations don't really > have an excuse at all. Except for the thousands of people running TNC's that cannot do open-squelch. I suspect most of these would be home stations rather than mobile or digi's. One of the things Bob wanted to do with APRS was allow all of these old TNC's that were sitting around collecting dust to be used for the new purpose. Of course there's something to be said for requiring people to _not_ be using 15-year-old equipment too.. -- Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com http://www.eskimo.com/~archer Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Next message: [aprssig] More efficient use of channel capicity throughshorterpackets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
