[aprssig] Too many digi's ?
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduFri Oct 20 11:07:46 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've been speculating to myself that maybe we don't have enough digis. If we got the existing digis down to a reasonable HAAT, thereby reducing the cell size, and added more digis we might get both better coverage and better control of the traffic. 3000' HAAT may be great for a voice repeater, but I suspect it isn't all that great for a digital network node. Maybe the high-site digis should be set so that they don't repeat a packet unless it isn't repeated by someone else in a reasonable time, thereby leaving the high-site digis to do fill-in and backup work. I don't have any data to support this, but I wouldn't mind seeing some numbers or simulations or tests to convince me one way or the other. Random thought before my caffeine takes effect... -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
