[aprssig] Too many digi's ?
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduFri Oct 20 14:21:41 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Joel Maslak wrote: > What's the current channel loading, for instance? Of course that's an important question, but the message that kicked off this thread talked about the large volume of traffic. > In Wyoming, we use several very high digis (3000' HAAT isn't > unusual but more the rule). No problem - we have a lightly loaded > network. Why not support wide-area communication if loading is low? There's no reason not to, but realize that most of us don't operate in such an area. For a comparison, Wyoming was talking about launching cell sites on high altitude balloons, so that two or three such cells could cover the state. North Alabama isn't all that highly populated compared to some places, but I'd guess it is a lot closer to average than Wyoming, and our cell towers are around 50' to 75' (and there are a lot more than three). -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
