[aprssig] Too many digi's ?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Oct 20 19:05:33 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> If the digis are all configured with dwait=0 and other > appropriate settings so that they all digi, immediately > and in unison, more digis, in general, are a > good thing. Yes, DWAIT must be set to 0. But I wonder about the phrase "more digis are a good thing. Of course it depends. If a mobile can be heard in an area, then more digis is a bad thing. And remember there will always be some collisions, so just because a single track had an outage area, does not mean it is always blocked. One way to improve coverage in a bad area is to *** reduce all the QRM coming in from out of the area from all other directions to the existing digis ***. Most digis are high enough so that even if they could hear a mobile in the black-hole, they might normally be able to hear other QRM from elsewhere just as strongly or strong enough so that it collides with the mobile in the area under consideration. SO my suggestion is to -not- start adding many digis to fill in black holes until the wider area has first fully adopted the New-N paradigm to cut down on the QRM that the existing digis are hearing from all over. Once they are hearing a clearer channel, then they should be able to hear better down into some of the previous black holes. De WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
