[aprssig] Too many digi's ?
Patrick Green pagreen at gmail.comSun Oct 22 19:03:38 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yeah, we have N overlays in the area too. I guess it'll take longer than the transition from 145.79 to 144.39. How long did that take? 73 de Pat --- KA9SCF. On 10/22/06, Cap Pennell <cap at cruzio.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >Perhaps the thing to concentrate on after the new paradigm is > establishing > power recommendations for stations? > > > >73 de Pat --- KA9SCF. > > Perhaps. After. Still more work on the (not very) new paradigm awaits, > and > we need everybody's help working on that. Can you believe we still have a > few digis showing the old-fashioned "N overlay" on their map symbols in > California? Heck, I even saw a station trying to use the long obsolete > RELAY and WIDE aliases the other day! > Amazing, eh? > 73, Cap KE6AFE > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20061022/1636b9e7/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Too many digi's ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
