[aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.comSat Sep 9 01:22:53 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The general consensus? Don't do it. If needed, use a local keyboard-to-keyboard frequency instead. 73, Cap KE6AFE > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of William McKeehan > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 12:44 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ? > > > What is the general concensus about having a packet node on 144.390? > > -- > William McKeehan > KI4HDU > Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net > http://mckeehan.homeip.net > > Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. > - Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
