[aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netSat Sep 9 04:03:15 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This response is basically what I expected to hear (except a lot more people jumping on me for even thinking about it). I would like to hear some logic as to why it's a bad idea. On Fri, September 8, 2006 9:22 pm, Cap Pennell said: > The general consensus? Don't do it. If needed, use a local > keyboard-to-keyboard frequency instead. > 73, Cap KE6AFE -- William McKeehan KI4HDU Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net http://mckeehan.homeip.net Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
