[aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
Daron J. Wilson daron at wilson.orgMon Sep 11 03:30:21 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In an area with one or two or three active users total - it wouldn't > be cost effective to build two separate systems when one would > work just fine. Any more users and activity would make sense > to build a separate system to carry the additional load. In that small of area, they could just run on the voice repeaters, it's just sharing bandwidth right? 73 N7HQR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
