[aprssig] Path loss question
Dave Baxter dave at emv.co.ukMon Sep 11 12:10:46 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Next message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
But as the frequency goes up, the wavelength goes down, so you can have more gain in the antenna department, omni (co-linear) or beam, for the same sort of size, negating much of the effects of increasing frequency. So, in practice, for the same physical sizes and powers, there is not a great deal of difference between 144 and 432 for a direct line of sight path, especialy at a distance (well into the "far field" region) What realy kill's things, is cable losses as the frequency goes up, unless you push the boat out big time in the cost of cables, or other types of feeder... Have Fun! Dave G0WBX. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Bruninga [mailto:bruninga at usna.edu] > Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 1:44 PM > To: vk4tec at tech-software.net; TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Path loss question > > Yes, > Path loss increases with the SQUARE of frequency. > > Thus from 2m to 70cm is about -9 dB > > de Wb4APR, Bob > > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Next message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
