[aprssig] APRSDepot.com
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comMon Sep 11 12:20:56 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRSDepot.com
- Next message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:35 AM, john b. leonard, jr. wrote: > Outstanding work! Thanks. I put W9JBL-9 in there, and immediately > I could > see where the digis didn't hear my sig. I was using a 5 watt ht. I must caution everyone about data derived from the APRS Internet System for propagation and network studies. The APRS-IS was designed for the purpose of distributing the data payloads. Duplicate filtering removes packets at every point within the APRS IS (and to a limited extent on RF) to keep the bandwidth usage as low as possible. It is estimated that only a tenth of the packets heard at IGates' TNCs are seen by clients on the APRS IS. None of the payload data is filtered, but perhaps 90% of the digipeater and IGate recipient data is filtered. If the filtering were random, an argument could be made for treating the data as a sample, with error bars determined by statistical means. Unfortunately, the data is VERY non-random, and non-random in a way that is dependent on impossible to quantitate factors. At each point, the first packet to arrive will have its entire packet forwarded. Two clients connected to different APRS IS hubs will see different digipeater and IGate info, dependent on digipeater delay times, RF propagation, internet propagation, and the exact interconnections present in the APRS Internet System. Any data source which has 90 percent of its data removed in a non- random way cannot be depended upon. Use this data with care and with full awareness of its shortcomings. For example, the above use is fine, looking for places where a single transmitter was not heard, because this is based on the payload data. This same information is available on APRSworld, jfindU, and findU among others. On the other hand, using this site to see whether a particular digi or IGate covers an area is not an appropriate use, there are systematic reasons that a packet transmitted in a given position could always be seen on the APRS IS via a different digi or IGate. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRSDepot.com
- Next message: [aprssig] Recommended IGate Connection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
