[aprssig] Tactical call signs
Matt Werner kb0kqa at gmail.comMon Apr 23 19:35:25 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tactical call signs
- Next message: [aprssig] Tactical call signs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Please explain the violation (and please cite Part 97). On 4/23/07, John Habbinga <kc5zrq at gmail.com> wrote: > The control operator of the station originating a message is primarily > accountable for any violation of the rules in this part contained in the > message. > > Digipeated traffic is not 3rd party traffic. The operator of the > digipeater, or the I-gate, is not responsible for the content of the > traffic. The operator of the digipeater is only responsible for making an > effort to prevent illegal traffic. > > > If it's digipeated then it's 3rd party traffic and the digipeater is > > responsible for IDing itself. Same goes for an I-Gate. > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Tactical call signs
- Next message: [aprssig] Tactical call signs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
