[aprssig] Re: Functional path to hit both WIDE and WIDEn-n digis?
kf4lvz at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 26 12:38:35 CDT 2007
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:45:38 -0400
> From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu>
> Subject: RE: [aprssig] Functional path to hit both
> WIDE and WIDEn-n
> > significant number of the digis in my area are
> > WIDE or RELAY and not WIDEn-n. I don't think any
> > amount of email is going to convince them to
> It is incumbent on everyone of us as users of the
> APRS system to
> provide encouragement, and assistance to all sysops
> to get these
> things changed. These old legacy systems have held
> us back for
> now 15 years, and about 3 years ago, we decided it
> was time to
> move on. Then New-N Paradigm resulted.
> The improvments to the system have been *dramatic*.
> If the existing sysops don't want to do anything, we
> must still
> get these legacy systems set to the new paramters or
> volunteers will just have to put up alternate digis.
> And users
> will have to stop using RELAY,WIDE to discourage
> While we are at it, have the SYSOPS add the
> VOICE repeater objects to their digis, so that
> travelers see
> these reeommendations on the front panel of their
> radios as they
> drive through.
> See http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/localinfo.html
> Bob, WB4APR
Yes, I understand all this but explain to me how to
convince a sysop to add something to a digipeater when
they don't want to change the thing in the first
place. I asked the question about the path because,
as of right now, APRS is completely useless if I don't
even get digipeated when I'm out and about. I can
hear plenty of traffic but my own posits never go
anywhere, APRS-IS or otherwise. The digis aren't
going to change overnight and emails to the owners
have gone unanswered. So all I can do is stop using
APRS completely or adjust my path to make it
functional even if it's not in the way you want.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the aprssig