[aprssig] RE: OT: Prius Battery Life and Replacement Cost (was:ControlHead Thieves)
Mark Fellhauer sparkfel at qwest.netThu Aug 30 01:15:48 UTC 2007
- Previous message: OT RE: [aprssig] Prius Battery Life and Replacement Cost (was:ControlHead Thieves)
- Next message: [aprssig] Surface mount 434 MHz tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:56 PM 8/28/2007, Robert Bruninga wrote: >2) The Prius uses Nickle-metal Hydride which is 97% (something >like that) non polluting and re-cyclable. It is only nickel and >maybe some trace metals. Compared to NiCd, which is well known >to be a big, big polluter. Again, they ignored the facts and >just wrote to who was paying them. > >We need to get back on topic. But the truth about the >environmental improvement of NIMH over NICD is worthwhile for >anyone that uses batteries. Do not discard NICD in the trash! >Recycle properly. Don't trash NIMH either, because they are 97% >(or something like that recyclable)... Again not to get too far off topic, but the subject of batteries and environmental costs impacts a hobby so reliant on batteries... Nickel is not non-polluting, the mining and refining/extraction of nickel is a nasty process. Nickel is usually mined in conjunction with copper. Phelps-Dodge (now Freeport McMoRan) has been identified as the 23rd largest corporate air polluter in the United States by the University of Massachusetts. Having dealt with plating operations I can tell you nickel is a poison by inhalation, ingestion, or even dermal contact. It is a known carcinogen, teratogenic, and mutagenic. Even very small amounts of nickel can cause death in humans. I cite "Sax - Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials" I have handled Nickel Acetate which can cause near-instantaneous death in humans in doses as small as 3ppm/cubic feet in air. Just because something is 97% recyclable by weight doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean it's easily recyclable, it doesn't mean the recycling process doesn't pollute, and it doesn't mean it's cost-effective to recycle. And it says nothing about the other 3%. Without going into examples and getting people farther astray - just about anything you do to "save the environment" involves robbing Peter to pay Paul. Anybody here want to live next door to a NiMH battery plant? Or put an elementary school next to one? I thought not... 73, Mark KC7BXS
- Previous message: OT RE: [aprssig] Prius Battery Life and Replacement Cost (was:ControlHead Thieves)
- Next message: [aprssig] Surface mount 434 MHz tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
