[aprssig] Helix Groundplane?
Russ Chadwick russ at wxqa.comThu Dec 13 13:35:38 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Helix Groundplane?
- Next message: [aprssig] Helix Groundplane?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Noskowicz wrote: > > Then...then Approaching this from another school of thought, if the plane > really is a "ground plane", it MUST have a reflection. An image, as we learned > in fields class, using the "method of images" (a mirror is a perfect analogy), > WILL have an effect on the antenna pattern and feed point Z. Stop me, stop > me, my brain hurts. > > The "method of images", mentioned above by Steve, also has a phase term that causes things to work like this (for the correct length, spacing and frequency): Given a perfect horizontal ground plane and a vertically directed line of current, the fields of the current and its image will interfere constructively in the far field to produce a maximum gain in the horizontal. Given a perfect horizontal ground plane and a horizontally directed line of current above the plane, the fields of the current and its image will interfere destructively in the far field to produce a null in the horizontal gain broadside to the line of current. They will interfere constructively to produce a maximum gain in the vertical. A vertically directed helix of current (depending on the pitch) will have predominately horizontally directed current and so I would expect the ground plane to increase vertical gain and decrease horizontal gain over that of the radiating element alone. Russ KB0TVJ
- Previous message: [aprssig] Helix Groundplane?
- Next message: [aprssig] Helix Groundplane?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
