[aprssig] Re: now, 1.5 Lptops Per Child : power options?
Mark A. Lewis mark at siliconjunkie.netMon Dec 31 23:46:47 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: now, 1.5 Lptops Per Child : power options?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remember, you are also using a VERY short lever. If you were to replace the crank with one that was say, 3 feet long you wouldn't even notice the load. Add a flywheel with some mass and you could keep it running with a little creative gearing and a modest power source like wind or water. Lots of alternative energy folks are using home brew contraptions in streams with car alternators to run bunches more than a laptop. -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Scott Miller Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 6:40 PM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] Re: now, 1.5 Lptops Per Child : power options? > One thing you forgot .. when you are generating electricity with a crank > generator .. you are doing *work*. Yeah, I learned that as a kid, with an old field telephone dynamo, a knife switch, and some light bulbs. You can crank like crazy until someone closes the circuit, and you'd just about break your arm if you were going fast enough. > My point is that a windmill or anemometer needs to overcome this > resistance to generate electricity .. and it is a considerable amount of > resistance believe me. Unless your windmill or anemometer has 15 or 20 > foot arms .. or you plan on waiting for a hurricane .. I don't think it > will work. It doesn't scale down to small sizes well, you're right. I was hoping it'd be feasible for low-power devices, even if it wasn't very efficient, but it's not looking good. Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: now, 1.5 Lptops Per Child : power options?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
