[aprssig] Good 30m Reference?
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSun Feb 4 21:10:26 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] VA3FES-14
- Next message: [aprssig] FW: reading aprs path question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Regarding HF paths: > Wouldn't GATE,WIDE2-1 be preferable? I'm assuming the > vast majority of people who can put up decent fixed 30m > antennas and gear should have no problem putting up a > 2m antenna that can hit a decent digi. My thinking included a few minor thoughts...: 1) W1-1 is more universal than W2-1. So it improves the probability very slightly. 2) W1-1 is a simpler concept that everyone can understand (1 hop) rather than having to explain 2-1. 3) A W2-1 path arrives everwhere as a WIDE2-0 or WIDE2 and makes it impossible to know that it was sent as a 1 hop packet or a 2 hop packet. Too many people then will criticize the sender, even though he was only sending 2-1. Yes a 2-1 packet should arrive as a DIGI,WIDE2* packet showing it was one hop, but it could have equally been a WIDE2-2 packet that went through 2 digipeater hops and only one digi identified itself, the other is an old-WIDEn-N digipeter that is not current with the New-N Paradigm. Bob, Wb4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] VA3FES-14
- Next message: [aprssig] FW: reading aprs path question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
