Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] dos on a winxp machine

Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf2 at aol.com
Tue Jan 9 05:53:18 UTC 2007

cap at cruzio.com wrote:
> I can still run APRSdos from within WindowsXPpro just fine.  (Granted, my
> hard-drive's file system is still FAT32 instead of NTFS.)
> 73, Cap KE6AFE
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssi

As long as Windows is running, the disk file system isn't an issue.  The 
trouble comes if you want to bypass Windows (of whatever flavor) and 
boot directly to "real" DOS from a floppy, CD-ROM or perhaps a USB flash 
drive.    Then NTFS volumes will become inaccessible.  

And most USB-based hardware (such as USB-to-serial converters), will 
disappear.  [DOS never heard of USB, although SOME recent motherboard 
BIOSes can now make some USB devices look like their earlier IDE or PS/2 
predecessors.]   Most BIOSes from the last two years or so support USB 
mice and keyboards from DOS (they make them "look like" classic PS/2 
devices).  A very few very recent motherboards will recognize external 
USB-connected hard disks and floppies.  

Further most modern "brain dead" printers, modems and soundcards 
dependent on huge Windows-based drivers that emulate non-existent 
hardware won't work at all from stand-alone DOS. 

Win 95 and 98 had actual DOS underneath (The "DOS 7.1" that can actually 
be used to format a bootable floppy or hard disk.)  Unlike the last 
"official" standalone DOS (Ver 6.22),   "DOS 7.1" will work with today's 
huge hard disks because it supports FAT32.     [ The classic DOS 6.22 
supported only FAT16 and maxed out at 2GB per partition unless you used 
some sort of 3rd-party add-on disk manager.  ]  

By contrast, 32-bit Windows (WinNT, Win2K and WinXP) only have a DOS 
emulator that produces a black window to type command lines.  There is 
no standalone DOS present that can be used to format a bootable floppy.  
Ever notice the subtle naming difference between the "DOS Prompt" 
offered in the Win95/98 "Accessories"  group, and the equivalent 
"Command Prompt" offered by Win2k and Xp?   It's because there is no 
real DOS there.   Although it actually does a pretty good job of 
emulating DOS within Windows.

By the way, the native Win2K/XP equivalent of .BAT batch files is .CMD . 


Stephen H. Smith    wa8lmf (at) aol.com
EchoLink Node:      14400    [Think bottom of the 2M band]
Home Page:          http://wa8lmf.com  --OR--   http://wa8lmf.net

NEW!   TNC Test CD

JavAPRS Filter Port 14580 Guide

"APRS 101"  Explanation of APRS Path Selection & Digipeating

Updated "Rev G" APRS            http://wa8lmf.net/aprs
Symbols Set for UI-View,
UIpoint and APRSplus:

More information about the aprssig mailing list