[SPAM] RE: [aprssig] UIview Digiepater add-on
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Jan 26 21:47:13 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [SPAM] RE: [aprssig] UIview Digiepater add-on
- Next message: [SPAM] RE: [aprssig] UIview Digiepater add-on
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I would think it should be more of a no hop path... i.e. > direct only. if the idea is to let local mobile APRS > users know about local voice repeaters, the > range of the object shouldn't really be reaching out to > through digipeaters. I'm beginning to realize, based on one of the other posts, that there are many non-KPC3+ digipeaters on mountains with nearby voice repeaters that may need to have a local such object. So in this case, then the Uiview down in the "hole" would need to have a ONE-HOP only path via that mountain top digi to advertise that colocated voice repeater. In all cases, this path would be 1 hop specific to that one digi. I don't see any need for a generic path to hit more than one digi. The down side, as I pointed out from the beginning, is that originating the packet down in a hole with a 1 hop path is much less than optimum, because the object is now just another digipeated packet that contributes to collisions to other local users at a 1 packet every 10 minute rate. That is pretty high rate.. Whereas, the original concept is to originate these packets at the all-hearing-digi so that it will only transmit one of these local-no-hop packets when the channel is clear. Thus, zero impact to local loading and no impact on local traffic. Good inputs, Keith, Thanks Bob, Wb4APR
- Previous message: [SPAM] RE: [aprssig] UIview Digiepater add-on
- Next message: [SPAM] RE: [aprssig] UIview Digiepater add-on
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
