[aprssig] Level 4 Routing ?
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netTue Jan 30 18:29:21 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Local Traveler Repeater Freq Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Local Traveler Repeater Freq Objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Today I was doing some research on digipeaters. In doing that I read Bob's doc: http://eng.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/APRS-docs/DIGIS.TXT At the bottom is a section that I found very interesting: --------------------------------------------------------- ORIGINAL LEVEL FOUR NETWORK CONSIDERATIONS: These concepts were proposed in the early days of APRS (1994) but have never caught on... THey are retained here for historical purposes. Since NODES are smarter than digipeating, the ultimate we should have NODES do all UI frame routing via high speed backbones. The APRS station simply sends his UI frame TO APRS VIA HOME; Any NODE hearing that transmission that has knowledge of the route to HOME, will send the single packet via the NODE network (level 4) to the HOME node! When it arrives at the HOME node, it is transmitted once as a UI frame. With this arrangement, a mobile only has to specify his one intended destination, no matter where he travels! In this example I use the DIGI call of HOME just to represent the digi near someone's HOME... DIGI/NODE COMPATIBILITY: Mobiles should be able to specify a path that is compatible with both nodes and digipeaters. The nodes should only look at the LAST digi field in an UNPROTO list for the final NODE destination. Any preceeding fields are assumed to be DIGI's only. This way a path of APRS VIA WIDE,HOME would be repeated by any WIDE that heard it, but any level 4 node that heard it would forward it to the HOME NODE. If only one field is included in the digipeater string, it would be interpreted as both a digi and a HOME destination without any difficulty. Digi's and NODEs would digipeat it, and nodes (hearing it direct) would forward it at level-4. --------------------------------------------------------- What would it take for this to be implemented? Can current day (new paradigm WIDEn-N) digis be upgraded to be a NODE while remaining a DIGI with the NODE routing overriding the DIGI routing? -- William McKeehan
- Previous message: [aprssig] Local Traveler Repeater Freq Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] Local Traveler Repeater Freq Objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
