APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
n0gik at qcom.net n0gik at qcom.netFri Jul 20 14:47:56 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Next message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Richard, I'm a WX spotter, a UI-VIEW user, iGate operator, and a T2 server operator. ( http://t2midwest.aprs2.net:14501 ) While I'm NOT sure what all the beef is about nor do I care - I DO take exception to the implied statement that APRS-IS data passed at the 'T2' level is not accurate and complete. :( Please refrain from such implications. 73 - Matt n0gik at n0gik.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Nicholas Piper IV To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:34 PM Subject: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages Why oh Why can't the folks at T2 see that people don't like to support them because of what happened with NOAA and CWOP??? I am a storm spotter and at times do use a TCP/IP UI-View connection so that I can see CWOP users as it helps me when trying to know what is going on when spotters go out. I most of the time when needing to get accurate info don't connect to at T2. Anyhow why can't people see the truth in what T2 did and why can't they see that some of us can't support them because we depend on the data the CWOP provides?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20070720/d8d12ce3/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Next message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
