APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
Ray Wells vk2tv at exemail.com.auFri Jul 20 22:32:40 UTC 2007
- Previous message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Next message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Danny Messano wrote: > The issue is not with boycotting anyone. > > The issue is that T2 *cut off* the CWOP users with an hour's notice, > as I recall. Yes, this was reversed, but they were *CUT OFF*. > > This is the basis for the "unreliable" statement, nevermind any > arguments you may want to make about T2. If it happened once due to > politics/policies, don't think it can't happen again. > > If I was using any service and suddenly found myself unable to use the > service due to a policy change by the sysops/admins, and then was > allowed back on later due to a reversed decision, I too would continue > to deem this service unreliable. If there was a second option, and in > this case there is, I would not have returned. Outages are one thing, > changes in policy are another. > > Cutting off the CWOP users was IMO as unprofessional an act one can > commit on amateur radio or the internet (and in this case, both). In > our hobby we have a fine line between hobby/play and hobby/service. > Taking down a 1200MHZ FM Repeater you and two of your buddies played > on is one thing, taking down your primary 2M Repeater used for SKYWARN > in tornado alley is another. There is a moral obligation to those you > are serving, and violating that is non-forgivable. > > What happened here was very much under the category hobby/service, but > it was treated like hobby/play, or even hobby/playing god. For that, > tagging the service as "unreliable" is much more than a professional > response to such an unprofessional act. > > dm > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] *On Behalf Of *Richard > Nicholas Piper IV > *Sent:* Friday, July 20, 2007 11:01 AM > *To:* TAPR APRS Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU > Messages > > Matt I was not saying that all data is not accurate. I was talking > about CWOP which NOAA has said it does not want on T2 servers. I > will not get into why becuase we have all seen the messages from > Phill and Stave on this. > > > What I am getting at is the it is in the best instrest of APRS and Ham > Radio if we all could just put our past behind use and realize that > some of us rely on data sent to APRS-IS and that data needs to be as > accurate as possible. Thus my reason for connecting to no-T2 when I > need to see CWOP info. > > I am not trying to bash anyone here. I am just trying to make a point > that in order for younger folks to come on board and stay with Ham > Radio we need not get into aurguments and bash each other. I speak > from experence on this as I left a Ham Club in the past becuase of the > aurguments and bashing that went on. It's bad for Ham Radio and trust > me PEOPLE WILL GO TO ANOTHER HOBBY! > > Folks being 26 I see that we need to get "new blood" into Ham Radio. > However, I don't think the new blood is going to come on when they > join a list like this on or others that have to do with Ham Radio and > see all the basing and aurguments that are going on. Ham Radio is > suposed to be a fun enjoyable hobby, but to me right now it's not as I > have to read email almost weekly where people are basing this or that > person. What ever happened to the "TRUE MEANING OF HAM RADIO?" The one > where someone wanted to help a friend out? The one where you didn't > bash or have a aurgement with another operator? The one where we all > go alone and helped each other out even when we thought the other > operator was wrong, they may but; but if we helped them out them both > of us could learn. > > To Steve with the Core, why not work to support Ham Radio and work > with T2? Yes I know that I have "boycotted" them in the past but the > reason I say this know is that God is showing me that in order for Ham > Radio to progress we all MUST WORK TOGETHER AND STOP THE BASHING AND > AURGUING. > > Ok I know this email is long but folks this all needed to be stated. > Agian lets all stop the bashing and aurguing. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > I have no idea what this bun fight started over, and I don't care. What I do know is that everyone makes mistakes, and the mark of an adult is to correct a known mistake, apologise, and move on, hopefully never to make the same mistake again. Remember, the only person who has never made a mistake is the person who has never done anything! Ray vk2tv
- Previous message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Next message: APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
