APRS-IS backbone operators - WAS: Re: [aprssig] findU Messages
Phillip B. Pacier
ad6nh at arrl.net
Sat Jul 21 09:49:31 CDT 2007
Richard Nicholas Piper IV wrote:
> Matt I was not saying that all data is not accurate. I was talking
> about CWOP which NOAA has said it does not want on T2 servers. I
> will not get into why becuase we have all seen the messages from
> Phill and Stave on this.
> What I am getting at is the it is in the best instrest of APRS and Ham
> Radio if we all could just put our past behind use and realize that
> some of us rely on data sent to APRS-IS and that data needs to be as
> accurate as possible. Thus my reason for connecting to no-T2 when I
> need to see CWOP info.
> I am not trying to bash anyone here. I am just trying to make a point
> that in order for younger folks to come on board and stay with Ham
> Radio we need not get into aurguments and bash each other. I speak
> from experence on this as I left a Ham Club in the past becuase of the
> aurguments and bashing that went on. It's bad for Ham Radio and trust
> me PEOPLE WILL GO TO ANOTHER HOBBY!
Then how do you explain a message on findU saying that unless you are
connected to a certain server, do not bother asking for help? How does
that further the hobby and invite people to continue to evolve in ham
radio and weather spotting?
> Folks being 26 I see that we need to get "new blood" into Ham Radio.
> However, I don't think the new blood is going to come on when they
> join a list like this on or others that have to do with Ham Radio and
> see all the basing and aurguments that are going on. Ham Radio is
> suposed to be a fun enjoyable hobby, but to me right now it's not as I
> have to read email almost weekly where people are basing this or that
> person. What ever happened to the "TRUE MEANING OF HAM RADIO?" The one
> where someone wanted to help a friend out? The one where you didn't
> bash or have a aurgement with another operator? The one where we all
> go alone and helped each other out even when we thought the other
> operator was wrong, they may but; but if we helped them out them both
> of us could learn.
Again, that is the original question I raised. Where is the true
meaning of ham radio in what is being propagated on the findU pages?
I'm only 31 - I'm not that far ahead of you (whatever that means or for
whatever it's worth).
> To Steve with the Core, why not work to support Ham Radio and work
> with T2? Yes I know that I have "boycotted" them in the past but the
> reason I say this know is that God is showing me that in order for Ham
> Radio to progress we all MUST WORK TOGETHER AND STOP THE BASHING AND
Again (and finally), it is something I have been trying to do for six
years. Being a God fearing man myself, I have extended the olive branch
to Steve on more than one occasion. The reason we are actually a
third-tier network is because Steve has convinced the core sysops not to
allow for assured connections for our thirty-plus servers. We were told
flat out that if we were unable to connect, that was too bad. Nothing
further on this - it has always been Tier 2 that has put forth the
effort to work with every area of APRS.
Phil - AD6NH
More information about the aprssig