[aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
Ken Patterson kenp at etex.netFri Jul 27 12:20:46 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Using Perl GD for plotting
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ok, since we are on the subject of digis, I have a question to pose. Why should a digi transmit it's position, wx or telemetry with any path at all? The digi's usefulness is only to the stations that can hear it -and- hit it. Those stations that can hear the digi pathless report will show it on their local station maps. The digi's pathless report -will- show up on findu, if an i-gate is within hearing range. If anyone outside the RF range of the digi wants to know the presence of a digi in the area, they can look on findu -or- just listen or watch for the digi's pathless position report once they enter the area. I operate a backyard digi with 3 paths & 1 no path in rotation (one of which includes RELAY for legacy purposes). I have considered changing to a totally pathless digi position report. Can anyone give a clear & concise reason why the majority of APRS digis should transmit it's own position, wx or telemetry report with a path? (Perhaps mountain top, remote or isolated digis being the exception)? de Ken N5EQT Digi: N5EQT-1
- Previous message: [aprssig] Using Perl GD for plotting
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
