[aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduFri Jul 27 12:34:37 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jul 27, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Ken Patterson wrote: > Can anyone give a clear & concise reason why the majority of APRS > digis > should transmit it's own position, wx or telemetry report with a path? That's three different questions in one. First telemetry: it depends entirely on the telemetry. Can't give an answer without knowing what the telemetry means and the intended audience. WX: should use a path to give similar coverage to other WX stations in the area. There's no major difference in this and other WX stations in the area, other than it's coming out of the digi. If it's a well sited digi, it should probably use one hop less than recommended, since it's got it's first hop to the digi by living in the same box as the digi. As for its own position, I cannot have a clear picture of what _my_ packet will do if I do not have a clear picture of the infrastructure in my area. I need to know about the network, and digis are the network infrastructure. Not all of us play the internet game. findu is a great tool, but honestly if findu and the whole APRS-IS disappeared from the planet completely, my use of APRS would change very little. All of this is just my opinion, of course. YMMV. -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
