[aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
Ken Patterson kenp at etex.netFri Jul 27 14:48:56 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>That is, they would beacon every 10 minutes direct, only once evrey 30 >minutes to the next tier, and only once an hour to the second tier. So, for my digi, a KPC-3+, two pathless beacons every 10 minutes, but a path of WIDE2-1 every 30 minutes and a path of WIDE2-2 every hour is suggested. Ok, that makes sense. >then these Voice Repeater Objects are only transmitted LOCALLY and DIRECT >by the well placed APRS digis. I haven't implemented this yet. I'll look into adding a pathless beacon object of the local 2M repeater. >WX data however, has a little more scope. WX data needs to be seen over a >slightly larger region to get the big picture in an area. I can see the purpose of this. I don't have Wx capabilities yet. Maybe someday. Good maybe for others to know. >Telemetry (KPC-3+) is usually only of interest to the OWNER of the digi, >and so the path only has to reach his location. True. I currently beacon some telemetry. On the next config change, I'll consider changing the telemetry path to pathless. Thanks for the explanation, Bob. de Ken, N5EQT
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Next message: [aprssig] Why Should a Digi Use a Path?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
