[aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
Danny Messano danny at messano.netSun Jun 10 02:46:55 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: Accuracy of data on APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That's 2 degrees F (-17) and 66 degrees F (19) within the same general area? Ok....... I can see why you would think that's correct. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Amirault [mailto:ramirault at verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 9:44 PM To: danny at messano.net; TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Messano" > -17 vs 12.2 and 19 in his *area* > > That's a big difference. > SO? ... how do we *know* that the information is "wrong"??? Richard Amirault Boston, MA, USA http://n1jdu.org http://n1jdu.org/Fandom/science.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: Accuracy of data on APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
