[aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
Andrew Rich vk4tec at people.net.auSun Jun 10 02:46:42 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Come on idiot It is not -17 deg - it is around 13 deg. Based on met buraeu data Wake up to your self -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Richard Amirault Sent: Sunday, 10 June 2007 11:44 AM To: danny at messano.net; TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Messano" > -17 vs 12.2 and 19 in his *area* > > That's a big difference. > SO? ... how do we *know* that the information is "wrong"??? Richard Amirault Boston, MA, USA http://n1jdu.org http://n1jdu.org/Fandom/science.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/842 - Release Date: 9/06/2007 10:46 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/842 - Release Date: 9/06/2007 10:46 AM
- Previous message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Accuracy of data on APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
