[aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE
Bob Burns W9RXR k4rxr_ at rlburns.netMon Nov 5 00:53:08 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE
- Next message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 06:04 PM 11/4/2007, J. Gary Bender, WS5N wrote: >I think T000 is the most likely to be innately understood. It will >probably be easier to parse in software as well, i.e. "T" is always >followed by 3 digits. I agree on both points. Bob, my "vote", as trustee for one carrier squelch repeater and vice president of a club that operates another carrier squelch repeater, is for T000. Bob...
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE
- Next message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
