[aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE

[Todd Springer]

I would go with TCSQ ( Tone Carrier Squelch ) It makes the most sense to me.
Todd
K6TJS

-----Original Message-----
From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
On Behalf Of Danny Messano
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 11:09 AM
To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE

TCSQ? 

-----Original Message-----
From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
On Behalf Of Bob Bruninga 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 8:25 AM
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: [aprssig] Voice Repeater NO-TONE

> Is there a standard way to represent no tone required? I realize that 
> the simple answer might be to simply omit the tone from the beacon 
> text...

Yes, I tend to leave it out when there is no tone.  That leaves more room
for other things of value.  But we do need a notone nomenclature.  How about
T000 or Tnot or Tzip or T--- or Tnil or...

Of these I guess I'd go with T000?


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig