[aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777
Blake Bowers bbowers at mozarks.comThu Nov 8 14:22:28 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That would be correct, you are not up on the regs. There is no requirement for someone to have a HAM license in order to own a HAM radio, there is no requirement for someone to have a business license to own a business radio, etc. Never has been. Transmitting is another thing. Many current business/public safety radios are capable of covering the HAM bands out of the box. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Green" <rtg at aapsc.com> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:14 PM Subject: Re: [aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777 > And I guess I'm not up on current FCC regs. I thought the FCC frowned > upon any tranciever able to function on frequencies of more than one > service. If this thing is really that broadbanded, does one need a > license in every service that it spans in order to legally own one? > > --
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Puxing PX-777
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
