[aprssig] Voice Repeater Frequency SPec
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Nov 9 00:21:45 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater Frequency SPec
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS Hardware Vendors Buying Up Mapping Data Vendors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In addition to the existing Tnnn, Dnnn, > these were added: 1750 and NoPL. Humm... I don't feel comfortable with CSQL for some reason, just not sure most hams would immediately recognize it. Not wanting to belabor the point. But another possibility is simply "Open". But in any case, it does not matter. We are trying to standardize on what the radios or sofware can parse. And so we must agree on the T###, D### or 1750 standard, but anything else can mean "no tone required" since if it is not a T### or D### or 1750, then there is nothing the radio has to do to use it anyway.. > http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/localinfo.html > http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/freqspec.txt I still see many examples trying to stuff T107.3 decimal points in there and T88.5 type entries. Those are the ones we need to tweak... > And if you have no PL and no tone, then those 4 > bytes may be used for other purposes. But only if needed. I'd prefer that the 4 byte field be retained for the squelch field even it it is not required just so it keeps the rest of the format rather standardized... Meaning, I guess use "NoPL", "open" or "CSQL" (though I don't prefer the last one)... > Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater Frequency SPec
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS Hardware Vendors Buying Up Mapping Data Vendors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
