[aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments
Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.comFri Nov 9 02:56:04 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments
- Next message: [aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fill-in digis all use it to indicate their "limit" now, "W1,fill-in". Best WIDEn-N path recommendations for courtesy are often less than the max "N" limit of our "S overlay" digis. http://web.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/kpc3+WIDEn.txt shows: 7) a) Always start with the PHGXXXX data (see my DIGIS.TXT file) b) next, a list of capablities, such as "W3,SSn". This means this digi supports WIDE3-3 and below and SSn-N paths only. (your state) c) The overlay character between the LAT/LONG should now be an "S" In Northern California our high level "S overlay" digis use "W2,NCAn" with the KPC TNC's UIdigi ON WIDE3-3,WIDE3-2,... You know, if you can get into the first digi at all, then two hops is plenty! <grin> 73, Cap California and Nevada "networka.htm" : http://cap.dyndns.org:8080/networka.htm http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/uitraffic/networka.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Robert Bruninga > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 14:21 PM > To: 'John Habbinga'; 'TAPR APRS Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments > > > > My station in Lubbock can hear virtually every > > digipeater in NM as you can see at > > http://pages.suddenlink.net/kc5zrq/networka.htm > > Looks like things are quite under control. Nice page. I see > only 2 people using WIDE5-5, and only one using WIDE4-4. All > the rest are 3-3 or below. Im beginning to think that the "W4" > recommendation in New Mexico might not be a "recommendation" but > the original definition of a "limit". > > But in the long run, for consistency, I think we need to move > toward that entry in all digipeaters beacon information to be a > "Wn" -recommendation-. That way it can be tailored to each > digi. Some very remote digis might need a higher receommended > value of N then those in the suburbs. > > If any of my references or documents infer it is a "limit", > remind me so I can change them to "receommendations". > > Thanks > > Bob, WB4APR > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments
- Next message: [aprssig] WIDE4-4 comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
