[aprssig] APRS resolution
Steve Noskowicz noskosteve at yahoo.comThu Oct 4 00:40:39 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Since I know the difference, I take that as a yes. (:-) 73, Steve Tapio Sokura <oh2kku at iki.fi> wrote: Steve Noskowicz wrote: > I'm no expert on GPS, but what about the random wander > of GPS. Does this level of accuracy need differential > GPS with a local GPS reference transmitter? There's a difference between accuracy and resolution. I'm not going to repeat the definitions, google can do that for you. Anyway your accuracy can be limited by resolution, which is the case with the regular 2 decimals of minute APRS. Of course good resolution doesn't guarantee accuracy (or precision), but at least good enough resolution doesn't prevent you from reaching good accuracy. Another thing entirely is whether typical uses of APRS need more resolution than two decimals of minute. Most probably don't. But the spec shouldn't unnecessarily restrict users from using good accuracy if they have the navigation gear to achieve it. Tapio _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig --------------------------------- Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20071003/d3e14be5/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
