[aprssig] APRS resolution
Ken H> sailingtoo at gmail.comFri Oct 5 14:34:08 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Does not look like there are many digi's on my route north riding up US45 or state hwy 17.... Ken H> On 10/5/07, Ken H> <sailingtoo at gmail.com> wrote: > Wes, you have stated it so clearly - thanks for the input. I'm outta > here - gotta head up home toward N. Alabama. Look for my APRS > positions K9FV-1 on the bike. We'll see how many *hits* I get on the > ride north. > > This site seems to be about the best for tracking - > http://aprs.he.fi/?call=K9FV-1 - there are a couple others that are > good also... > > I'll be running WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 with PL100 and Voice Alert. > > 73 de K9FV > > On 10/5/07, Wes Johnston, AI4PX <wes at ai4px.com> wrote: > > When we started with gps units when selective availablility was on, my GPS > > would "wander" within a 25 to 35 meter circle. At that time, 20 meters for > > an aprs position made sense. > > > > The day SA was turned off, my GPS started wandering in a 5 meter circle. > > > > WAAS came along and my gps wanders in a 2 or 3 meter circle. > > > > So at a glance it makes sense to have aprs resolution go to 2 meters. > > (accuracy and precision belong to the GPS, _resolution_ belongs to the > > protocol used to convey the information). While, yes it's true that my gps > > Try explaining > > to a lay person why an object placed in a parking lot is within a 60ft > > box.... which is two rows over and several parking spaces away from where > > the object actually is. > > > > Wes >
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
