[aprssig] CQSRVR and JOTA/SCOUTS
AE5PL Lists HamLists at ametx.comSun Oct 21 14:26:59 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] NWSRVR
- Next message: [aprssig] NWSRVR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Actually no "melt-down" will occur. If all 20,000 APRS users (count for over the past 30 days) tried to do a CQ FIELDAY, CQSRVR, APRS-IS, and the respective local APRS RF networks could handle it. That is because the CQSRVR logic already prohibits beaconing a CQ more often than every 30 minutes and because all CQSRVR originated messages are unnumbered. Of course, Field Day rules explicitly prohibit contacts made through the Internet which would include this type of communication. Don't make this more complicated than it needs to be. CQSRVR conforms to APRS and APRS-IS requirements, and has built-in safeguards to make it a non-issue with regards to network performance, both APRS-IS and APRS RF. 73, Pete Loveall AE5PL pete at ae5pl dot net > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Bruninga > Posted At: Sunday, October 21, 2007 8:22 AM > Subject: RE: [aprssig] CQSRVR and JOTA/SCOUTS > > With this random CQ capability, APRS can make a huge inpact dring Field > Day, though of course, the CQSRVR logic will need to be modified to > prevent melt-down. > > I wonder what kind of moderating mechanism would work to keep the > network from total grid lock. My thinking is that since CQ is a
- Previous message: [aprssig] NWSRVR
- Next message: [aprssig] NWSRVR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
