[aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
Jan T. Pharo la2bba at jpharo.netFri Sep 7 09:29:20 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] T2SOCAL now supports IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ben Lindner <vk5jfk at activ8.net.au>, Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:27:05 +0930: >Jan > >We will have to agree to disagree on this one Well, probably. And APRS will work anyway, and neither inches nor feet are useful for measuring repeater (or digipeater) ranges. > >Ben > >Jan T. Pharo wrote: >> Ben Lindner <vk5jfk at activ8.net.au>, Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:13:38 +0930: >> >> >>> A kilo foot would be 1012 inches correct :-) >>> >> >> Hardly, if "kilo" is 1000 (it is). >> a foot is 12 inches. >> a kilofoot (k') is 1000' i.e. 12000". >> -- 73 de Jan, LA2BBA Hvaler, Norway
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] T2SOCAL now supports IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
