[aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comFri Sep 7 18:57:24 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Mark Fellhauer wrote: > You follow a celestial reference point. Um, that would be a star. In an imprecise sense you are right, in that the sun is a star. The first known measurement of the earth's diameter was calculated using the angle of the sun during the summer solstice. In Egypt it was known to be 90 degrees, because the sun shone on the bottom of deep well (by coincidence along the Tropic of Cancer) but in Greece Hipparcos measured a smaller angle, and from that he calculated the value of the earth's diameter with less than 5% error. An interesting aside, the Romans "improved" the calculation to an error of almost 40%, and this erroneous value was believed for a long time. Despite what you may have heard in grade school, no one, not even the lowest sailor with Columbus, believed the earth was flat in 1492. However, because they thought the earth was much smaller than it really was, they expected to hit the orient long before they landed in the Bahamas. It was this unexpected delay in landfall that nearly led to the mutiny we were told about. I think the truth is a far more interesting story, but for some reason people prefer the earth is flat story... Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
