[aprssig] Metric vs English Systems
Jan T. Pharo la2bba at jpharo.netFri Sep 7 20:27:02 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Metric vs English Systems
- Next message: OT: RE: [aprssig] Metric vs English Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Andy Gonzales" <kg6rwo2 at gmail.com>, Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:57:13 -0700: >I was in Europe this past May and they don't use metric all the time. >When we would ask how far a certain place was they would tell you in >terms of time - most things were 15 minutes walking distance away, about 1 km. Time as a measure of distance is often used. I don't know how it is in your country (or your continent, as you are referring to Europe, not one particular country) - but I at least will often tell those asking about distances both the distance in km and the time to walk or to drive by car, knowing the road condition - it could be a motorway or a 4 m wide secondary, winding road - or anything between. But distances are given in km or, particularly in Sweden and often in Norway, in "mil" which is 10 km - distance signs are in km, though. To be ON topic: Distances in the user defined APRS-server filters are in km as well, even in UK and USA. Time would be a poor unit there :-) -- 73 de Jan, LA2BBA Hvaler, Norway
- Previous message: [aprssig] Metric vs English Systems
- Next message: OT: RE: [aprssig] Metric vs English Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
