Spam: Re: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
Ben Lindner vk5jfk at activ8.net.auFri Sep 7 21:36:46 UTC 2007
- Previous message: Spam: Re: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan I live in the metric world and I think its much easier than imperial. When I went to school here in Australia, I got caught in the changeover from imperial to metric and didnt that confuse things when I was just a child of about 6 ot 7 years old. I can now work with both, but do prefer metric as its all base 10 and much easier. Ben VK5JFK Jan T. Pharo wrote: > Ben Lindner <vk5jfk at activ8.net.au>, Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:20:53 +0930: > > >> Kilo = 1,000 >> > > Right. i.e., the unit 1000 times. > > >> Foot = 12 inches >> > > Right. Foot is the unit. > > >> 1,000+12 = 1,012 >> > > that calculation is correct, but it doesn't represent kilofoot. > > k' is 1000*1' = 1000*12" = 12000" inches > > (but, see my other message with a little more APRS relevance) > >
- Previous message: Spam: Re: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Metric [[furlongs per fortnight]]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
