[aprssig] Lubbock Paths?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Sep 17 13:00:58 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] Lubbock Paths?
- Next message: [aprssig] Lubbock Paths?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Actually, I think we were misslead by the web page that made no mention of WIDE2-2. Looking at FINDU centered on Lubbock, It appears that Lubbock has an excellent set of digis and they appear to be properly configured For New-N. http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/near.cgi?call=KC5ZRQ-10 It looks like surrounding areas are still using "N" digis that have not been fully updated with settings, but they do support WIDEn-N. So, it looks like there is no problem at all. Its just the wording on the original web page that seemed to imply that WTX2-2 was the only recoemmnded path was missleading. End of drill. Go Texas! Bob, WB4APR Not only that, but they have a WinLINK object as well. > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Earl Needham > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 12:47 AM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Lubbock Paths? > > At 11:33 AM 9/16/2007, John Habbinga wrote: > >Does this website help? > > > >http://pages.suddenlink.net/kc5zrq/ > > So does this mean the digis at Anton, Idalou, and Crosbyton > have moved to UHF, or are they just gone? I haven't seen anything > other than LBB-3 the last few times I've gone through Lubbock. > > Earl > > KD5XB -- Earl Needham > Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs > Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Lubbock Paths?
- Next message: [aprssig] Lubbock Paths?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
