[aprssig] TWO-WAY trackers!
Arno Verhoeven (PE1ICQ) pe1icq at sharon.esrac.ele.tue.nlSat Sep 22 17:52:02 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [aprssig] TWO-WAY trackers!
- Next message: [aprssig] TWO-WAY trackers!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I agree, transmitting without listening isn't good amateur practice. > Well if we start talking about decency, then I think that we should include output power in the discussion. I personally think that the TM-D700 and TM-D710 have a too big mouth. I believe that 6 to 10W is plenty for a tracker. I also believe that in some circumstances it is perfectly OK to use a low power transmit-only tracker. After all, how many collisions do you really avoid with a tracker that listens for channel occupancy? Sure, you will hear the digi, and nearby stations, but the digi itself will most likely hear a constant stream of data from lots of (distant) stations that your mobile tracker will not hear. So even you listen if the channel is free, chances are that you packets will still collide. But a big mouth TM-D7x0 with 50W will solve that problem... right? -- 73, PE1ICQ Arno Verhoeven
- Previous message: [aprssig] TWO-WAY trackers!
- Next message: [aprssig] TWO-WAY trackers!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
