[aprssig] Protocols

[Scott Miller]

That's not counting the bytes in the destination address field, though! 
  We were talking about how compact you can make things without worrying 
about backwards compatibility.

Scott
N1VG

Robert Bruninga wrote:
>> What I found is that even in my own dabblings 
>> here, I can pack data much more efficiently.
>> Astrerix works something like this
>>  
>> 40 00 16 30 27 34 56 43 45 45 67
>>  
> 
> But a Mic-E packet only takes 9 Data bytes:
> 
> 'LLLCSP$\
> 
> And it is decodable by all existing APRS systems.
> No real need to come up with incompatible formats on APRS that
> existing users cannot decode...
> 
> Bob, Wb4APR
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
>