Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] Protocols

Scott Miller scott at opentrac.org
Fri Apr 4 14:32:50 UTC 2008


That's not counting the bytes in the destination address field, though! 
  We were talking about how compact you can make things without worrying 
about backwards compatibility.

Scott
N1VG

Robert Bruninga wrote:
>> What I found is that even in my own dabblings 
>> here, I can pack data much more efficiently.
>> Astrerix works something like this
>>  
>> 40 00 16 30 27 34 56 43 45 45 67
>>  
> 
> But a Mic-E packet only takes 9 Data bytes:
> 
> 'LLLCSP$\
> 
> And it is decodable by all existing APRS systems.
> No real need to come up with incompatible formats on APRS that
> existing users cannot decode...
> 
> Bob, Wb4APR
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
> 





More information about the aprssig mailing list