[aprssig] Protocols
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Apr 4 17:48:17 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Protocols
- Next message: [aprssig] Protocols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> That's not counting the bytes in the > destination address field, though! If you are going to send it over AX.25 packet you are stuck with the AX.25 addresses. So the Mic-E only uses 9 bytes. And those 9 bytes carry not just position, but also includes Course, Speed, a symbol code for over 3000 different symbols, and a 3 bit message code. > We were talking about how compact you can make things > without worrying about backwards compatibility. But, As you know, I worry *very much* about maintaining compatibility of all APRS systems for all users... > ----original message ------- > >> What I found is that even in my own dabblings > >> here, I can pack data much more efficiently. > >> Astrerix works something like this > >> > >> 40 00 16 30 27 34 56 43 45 45 67 > >> > > > > But a Mic-E packet only takes 9 Data bytes: > > > > 'LLLCSP$\ > > > > And it is decodable by all existing APRS systems. > > No real need to come up with incompatible formats > > on APRS that existing users cannot decode... > > > > Bob, Wb4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Protocols
- Next message: [aprssig] Protocols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
