[aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVL System ???
Christopher K. Greenhalgh chris at n8wct.comSun Dec 28 23:07:45 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVL System ???
- Next message: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVL System ???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>-----Original Message----- >From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org >[mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Patrick >Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:16 AM >To: TAPR APRS Mailing List >Subject: Re: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a >Commercial AVL System ??? > > >The trackers though aren't transmitters in and of themselves which is >what requires fcc licenses... Not entirely correct. There are no laws, part 97 or otherwise, that prohibits anyone from having a transmitter. The "law" is "to transmit". I ve known a lot of hams who bought transceivers before their license were valid, to listen or otherwise familiarize themselves with the equipment. As long as the don't *transmit*, they are not in any violation. 73, Chris N8WCT
- Previous message: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVL System ???
- Next message: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVL System ???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
