[aprssig] Objects vs real stations
Jack Spitznagel frawg at frawg.orgWed Dec 31 19:39:22 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Objects vs real stations
- Next message: [aprssig] Objects vs real stations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob Bruninga wrote: > Yes, I assumed that any active amateur radio operator would be a member of the National Organization for Amateur Radio, (the ARRL). Bob, /*extreme irony switch on*/ Isn't that like assuming everyone is happy to pay taxes to keep roads and bridges from breaking up and/or falling down even though they drive millions of miles on those roads? The civic responsibility concept has been an "obsolete" idea since 1980! To support anything that does not directly benefit "me now" would be un-American! United? States? To actually DO SOMETHING with other like-minded people FOR THE BENEFIT of folks in the future ???? Absurd!!! /*extreme irony switch off*/ I thought the whole QST vs 73 controversy about who "owns" ham radio had died long ago. Haven't we learned from such varied interests as AOPA, the NRA, the Nature Conservancy, and "Big Pharma" - that standing together and working for some common goals actually works? I guess not... Just too much to ask in a free society. All that being said... I am a member, have an ARRL address, and agree with you. Jack - kd4iz - the curmudgeon
- Previous message: [aprssig] Objects vs real stations
- Next message: [aprssig] Objects vs real stations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
