[aprssig] FINDU Weather Intermittency
Greg Noneman gregn1 at cox.netSat Feb 9 16:46:43 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] FINDU Weather Intermittency
- Next message: [aprssig] FINDU Weather Intermittency
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gerry, I'm not saying this for any logical reason, but just gut feel. Wouldn't it be better to start off connection to the separate cwop.aprs.net servers with a completely new set of ports? It just seems like this may be beneficial somewhere down the line and be less confusing. Greg On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Gerry Creager wrote: > As of about 1400z today, cwop1.tamu.edu went live and entered the > cwop.aprs.net rotation in place of first.aprs.net and > second.aprs.net. Over time, I anticipate adding several more CWOP- > only sites. At the same time, I'm working with NOAA, CWOP (they're > officially separate) and the software developers to effect a > transition to the CWOP-dedicated servers. > > At the same time, with the loss of THIRD and FOURTH, which I am > really sorry to see go, I'm recruiting another Core server or two. > For a variety of reasons, I'll be looking toward members of the > Academic community to help with this, but to be blunt, for the most > part it's to mitigate the bandwidth issues. > > I anticipate a couple of rough weeks while we make some changes, but > I think I can say that we're doing the best to minimize trauma in > the process to the APRS community as well as the CWOP community. > > Jim, I, too, am excited by CWOP and what it offers for both > operational and research atmospheric sciences. It's too valuable an > asset to allow it to have serious problems. > > 73 gerry n5jxs > > Jim Duncan wrote: >> I am excited about what the CWOP people have been doing. At the >> outset I questioned whether they should be on the APRS servers >> because of the possibility of accidental porting of CWOP station >> data out via APRS stations. >> At the time I asked Riley Hollingsworth his opinion on the legality >> of this and it was his opinion at this would constitute remote >> control by an unlicensed operator and the station licensee which >> transmitted the information would be liable for a violation. >> Now, that being said, the growth of CWOP has been phenomenal and it >> has provided not only an opportunity for non-hams to participate in >> severe weather and routine weather condition reporting but has also >> inspired a lot of people to get their ham licenses which is always >> a positive thing! >> I certainly believe that the move to take CWOP's off of the APRS >> system and provide an independent system is an excellent idea. It >> would certainly be easy enough for those who wish to monitor that >> data to do so in APRS and I am certain that there are people out >> there that appreciate having this information readily available, >> especially the National Weather Service personnel locally here. >> I wish the CWOP group continued success as they move forward and >> salute them for their volunteerism! >> 73 de Jim Duncan, KU0G >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at lists.tapr.org >> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > -- > Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu > Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University > Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983 > Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843 > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] FINDU Weather Intermittency
- Next message: [aprssig] FINDU Weather Intermittency
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
