[aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comTue Jan 8 16:49:36 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 8, 2008, at 11:23 AM, William McKeehan wrote: > Let me jump in and ask a really simple question. > > If I transmit my position to degree precision (for example 35 . N > \083 . > W), to plot that "location" on a map, I would mark an everything > from 3500.00N > to 3559.59N and 08300.00W to 08359.59W, right? > > So that would be the possible area (whatever geometric shape it may > be) that I > can be in, right? You are thinking like an engineer, not a kludger. What Bob intends by this report is not that you are located within the polygon (which should indeed be indicated by shading the polygon), but that your best guess is your position is there, but you only know to an error of 60 miles. Bob shows this by drawing a 60 mile radius around 35.5/83.5. An engineer would display this as a polygon 60 miles LARGER than the polygon 35-36 by 83-84, but then again an engineer would have designed the protocol to send a precise best guess along with an uncertainty value, so the display actually meant something. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
