[aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgTue Jan 8 17:21:24 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For what it's worth, OpenTRAC has a positional ambiguity represented as a 16-bit integer in meters - enough for a radius of up to 65 km. Though in looking at the spec, I think it needs to be more clearly defined what the 'estimated error radius' is. One of these days I'll have time to work on it some more. I'm getting there - as of yesterday, I'm no longer officially employed full time for the first time since... well, since I got my first full-time job. Not that it affects the number of hours I work each week, but now I get to spend a few more of those hours on APRS and radio stuff! Scott N1VG Steve Dimse wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Steve Dimse wrote: > >> For ambiguities that do not cross the poles or equator (the only case >> allowed by the protocol), the border away from the equator is shorter >> than border towards the equator, making it a trapezoid. > > To be correct, this statement should be > > For ambiguities that do not reach or cross the poles or cross the > equator, the border away from the equator is shorter than border towards > the equator, making it a trapezoid. > > Minor difference, but I think the protocol does allow ambiguity to reach > (but not cross) the poles, and the linear projection of this would be a > triangle. > > Steve K4HG > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
