[aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Jan 8 18:24:06 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I still don't like polygons. These Boxes drawn exactly on a LAT/LONG grid imply a precise boundary of ambiguity which is totally missleading and of drastically differrent sizes from the eauator to the poles. They just convey the wrong information completely. I like the original APRSdos circles whos radius approximates the degree of ambiguity. This completely eliminates any distortion no matter where on the planet they occur. Bob WB4APR > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Curt, WE7U > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 12:17 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS! > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Steve Dimse wrote: > > > You do not have the ability to place the > > center anywhere you want, just in the center of pre-defined > polygons, > > with predetermined radii. (And sorry Curt, my extreme nitpicking > > suggests the linear projection of these polygons is never a > rectangle. > > For ambiguities that do not cross the poles or equator (the > only case > > allowed by the protocol), the border away from the equator > is shorter > > than border towards the equator, making it a trapezoid. Though they > > can't be represented by the APRS implementation, ambiguities that > > cross the equator would be hexagons, and the interesting > polar case is > > left as an exercise for the reader!) > > Saw your correction right after this calling them a trapezoid. > Trapezoids are correct - For some projections. They'd be trapezoids > with slightly curved sides (which I'm sure goes against the > _mathematical_ definition of trapezoids, but who cares!). > > For unprojected lat/long, they're rectangles, even at the polar > regiions (weird huh?). Not that any of this matters much to the > current discussion about ambiguity. hi hi > > -- > Curt, WE7U: <www.eskimo.com/~archer/> XASTIR: <www.xastir.org> > "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown > "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U > The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system! > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Position Ambituity in APRS!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
